Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Mullahs' "surge" is working...?

The second round of ambassadorial talks between the United States and the Iranian mullahs on the future of Iraq ended yesterday in Baghdad. According to the news reports, it became roughly a shouting match between Crocker- the US talking head- and the mullahs' terrorist-in-chief in Iraq, Kazemi Qomi (USA Today, July 25, 2007), whereby the American Ambassador accused the mullahs, correctly we add, of supporting division and fomenting violence. Little more can be said on this, although much more will be fruitlessly added; the United States provided the initial opening for the genocidal mullahs to begin operating freely in Iraq. There seems to be little disagreement between the pundits, that the American "surge"- the new acronym for infusion of additional troops- has largely been ineffective where it matters the most; i. e. checking the mullahs influence in Iraq.

According to Riad Kahwaji of the Institute for Near East and Gulf Military Analysis (Christian Science Monitor, July 25), "The Iranians are running the ship in Iraq, not the Americans. They also have [many] more chips on the tables in Iraq than the US,". In a nutshell, the mullahs' "surge" is working in Iraq.

The model of influence peddling which the mullahs have implemented in Iraq is a carbon-copy of what has been attempted in Lebanon, in manufacturing the Hezbollah into the most influential force there, in Afghanistan Herat province, in building infrastructure- roads, hospitals, schools, parks, and fire-optic internet, in Palestine, in assisting Hamas, and of course, who should forget, in Iran, in the early days of the Revolution. The model is to create an ideaological base, provide logistical support and funding for a militia force, set a social, economic and political net wide enough to be inclusive to the extent that it provides for the welfare of its constituency, and slowly through ideology and coercion produce a subject system. Khomeini spent 16 years in Najaf and Karbala creating the infrastructure network, before moving on to Iran.

One would have to wonder and immensely: how the world's lone superpower with more than 160,000 active and fully armed troops in Iraq would sit across a table with an admittedly terrorist activist to discuss "the future of Iraq" and complain that "the two months since May (the two sides met first on May 28) have not exactly been encouraging", (Ryan Crocker, Reuters, July 25, 2007), referring to the increase (read surge) of activity by the mullahs in Iraq.

The simple truth is that a military solution to the mullahs menace is a myth; the sooner we come to this conclusion, the better. No other place is the idealogical warfare more intense. The mullahs must be stopped on all fronts, but these fronts can be faced only with those who truly understand the nature of this maniacal regime- the Iranian Resistance. They must be cut loose to work their magic against the Iranian mullahs.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home